GLW vs. SLF
GLW (Corning Incorporated) and SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) are both stocks. GLW operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while SLF operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, GLW returned 24.83%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for SLF. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLW vs. SLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLW achieves a 76.55% return, which is significantly higher than SLF's 33.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GLW has outperformed SLF with an annualized return of 24.83%, while SLF has yielded a comparatively lower 14.00% annualized return.
GLW
- 1D
- -5.14%
- 1M
- -26.58%
- 6M
- 65.30%
- YTD
- 76.55%
- 1Y
- 188.31%
- 3Y*
- 70.67%
- 5Y*
- 33.58%
- 10Y*
- 24.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
SLF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 32.93%
- YTD
- 33.00%
- 1Y
- 35.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.73B | $3.25B | $2.85B | |
| $48.77M | $44.56M | $50.72M |
GLW vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 76.55% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 33.00% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLW and SLF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2000 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GLW and SLF has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GLW:
$132.54B
SLF:
$45.07B
GLW:
$2.10
SLF:
CA$6.39
GLW:
73.28
SLF:
17.94
GLW:
8.13
SLF:
1.49
GLW:
11.25
SLF:
2.02
GLW:
$16.32B
SLF:
CA$39.40B
GLW:
$5.93B
SLF:
CA$20.48B
GLW:
$3.77B
SLF:
CA$4.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLW vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank
GLW
SLF
GLW vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corning Incorporated (GLW) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLW | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 3.56 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | 9.03 | +8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLW vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLW drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than SLF's maximum drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLW and SLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLW | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -78.60% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.12% | -10.06% | -30.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.12% | -14.91% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.12% | -30.77% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.80% | -50.84% | +2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.75% | -0.53% | -39.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -16.80% | -33.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.53% | 3.96% | +6.57% |
Volatility
GLW vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison
Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a higher volatility of 32.52% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) at 4.26%. This indicates that GLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLW | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.52% | 4.26% | +28.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.96% | 14.46% | +46.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.55% | 19.80% | +46.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.10% | 19.38% | +19.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.61% | 22.68% | +12.93% |
Dividends
GLW vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison
GLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SLF's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.73% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.27% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
Financials
GLW vs. SLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corning Incorporated and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GLW vs. SLF - Profitability Comparison
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLW and SLF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (32.52%) compared to SLF (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLW dropped -99.02% vs SLF's -78.60%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLW and SLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer