GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L
GLUG.L (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - GLUG.L tracks the L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GLUG.L returned 8.35% vs 22.07% for WRDA.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLUG.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.
Performance
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLUG.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLUG.L achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.
GLUG.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLUG.L L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF | 4.52% | 15.76% | 8.12% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.11% | 21.28% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLUG.L and WRDA.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between GLUG.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLUG.L
WRDA.L
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLUG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLUG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 1.20 | +0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLUG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLUG.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLUG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -27.71% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.66% | -27.71% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -15.53% | +9.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -7.46% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 18.35% | -12.88% |
Volatility
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (GLUG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that GLUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLUG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.96% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 9.04% | +3.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 43.30% | -27.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 29.74% | -12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 29.74% | -10.36% |
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLUG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLUG.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLUG.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLUG.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GLUG.L.
GLUG.L tracks L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GLUG.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.
Find the right allocation for GLUG.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer