PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTL.L vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLTL.L is traded in GBP, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTL.L achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 17.86% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTL.L has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of -3.59%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 70.51% annualized return.


GLTL.L

1D
0.41%
1M
2.69%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
0.19%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
-10.85%
10Y*
-3.59%

NVDA

1D
1.94%
1M
12.43%
YTD
17.86%
6M
18.56%
1Y
55.78%
3Y*
73.06%
5Y*
67.47%
10Y*
70.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLTL.L
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
-3.57%3.16%-10.46%1.26%-40.67%-6.57%13.60%11.56%0.21%3.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
17.86%29.02%175.99%222.07%-44.35%127.62%115.77%70.21%-26.71%66.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTL.L and NVDA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTL.L vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTL.L
GLTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTL.LNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.27

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

2.75

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

6.03

-5.99

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTL.L and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTL.LNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

1.63

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

1.34

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

1.43

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.80

-0.83

Drawdowns

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTL.L drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -79.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTL.L and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTL.LNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-79.51%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-20.42%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-39.34%

+22.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.99%

-59.90%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.18%

-59.90%

+4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.05%

-7.25%

-44.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.76%

-28.41%

+8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

9.28%

-5.01%

Volatility

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) is 5.33%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.50%. This indicates that GLTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTL.LNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

12.50%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

25.10%

-15.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

34.36%

-21.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

50.53%

-30.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

49.41%

-32.40%

Dividends

GLTL.L vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

GLTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLTL.L
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
5.12%4.77%4.39%2.97%1.63%0.87%1.01%1.43%1.55%1.86%1.99%2.51%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLTL.L and NVDA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTL.L and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer