PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GLTL.L vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GLTL.LCOST
YTD Return-3.81%38.07%
1Y Return6.71%67.85%
3Y Return (Ann)2.83%27.03%
5Y Return (Ann)68.71%27.74%
10Y Return (Ann)35.03%24.45%
Sharpe Ratio0.513.33
Daily Std Dev14.88%19.60%
Max Drawdown-48.31%-70.95%
Current Drawdown-41.26%-0.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between GLTL.L and COST is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GLTL.L vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GLTL.L achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 38.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GLTL.L has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 35.03%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 24.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.37%
24.40%
GLTL.L
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLTL.L vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTL.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLTL.L, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLTL.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLTL.L, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLTL.L, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLTL.L, currently valued at 1.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.77
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 17.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.22

GLTL.L vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GLTL.L and COST.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.84
3.45
GLTL.L
COST

Dividends

GLTL.L vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

GLTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than COST's 2.13% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GLTL.L
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
3.93%2.97%162.91%44.24%1.01%1.43%1.55%1.86%1.99%2.51%2.63%3.67%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.13%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

GLTL.L vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -70.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTL.L and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-42.70%
-0.95%
GLTL.L
COST

Volatility

GLTL.L vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) is 3.34%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that GLTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.34%
5.21%
GLTL.L
COST