GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE).
GLTL.L and XDEQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLTL.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on May 17, 2012. XDEQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. Both GLTL.L and XDEQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GLTL.L or XDEQ.DE.
Key characteristics
| GLTL.L | XDEQ.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.00% | 17.33% |
| 1Y Return | 7.41% | 23.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.76% | 9.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 68.66% | 12.83% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.47 | 2.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.86% | 11.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.31% | -32.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -41.38% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLTL.L and XDEQ.DE is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GLTL.L achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.DE's 17.33% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLTL.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
GLTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, while XDEQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTL.L SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF | 3.94% | 2.97% | 162.91% | 44.24% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.51% | 2.63% | 3.67% |
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, which is greater than XDEQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTL.L and XDEQ.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GLTL.L vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) is 3.24%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that GLTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.