PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLTL.L vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLTL.L is traded in GBP, while NIO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NIO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLTL.L achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 12.02% return.


GLTL.L

1D
0.41%
1M
2.69%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-4.08%
1Y
0.19%
3Y*
-0.97%
5Y*
-10.85%
10Y*
-3.59%

NIO

1D
-1.04%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
12.02%
6M
12.79%
1Y
53.20%
3Y*
-11.75%
5Y*
-32.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLTL.L
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
-3.57%3.16%-10.46%1.26%-40.67%-6.57%13.60%11.56%1.29%
NIO
NIO Inc.
12.02%8.64%-51.09%-11.62%-65.56%-34.39%1,076.82%-39.29%-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GLTL.L and NIO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLTL.L vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLTL.L
GLTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLTL.LNIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.18

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

1.20

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

2.20

-2.15

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLTL.L and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLTL.LNIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

0.85

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

-0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.03

-0.01

Drawdowns

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLTL.L drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, smaller than the maximum NIO drawdown of -94.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLTL.L and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLTL.LNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-94.70%

+39.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.86%

-44.61%

+33.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-79.79%

+63.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.99%

-93.61%

+40.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.05%

-90.86%

+38.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.76%

-67.24%

+47.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

24.29%

-20.02%

Volatility

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTL.L) is 5.33%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 18.74%. This indicates that GLTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLTL.LNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

18.74%

-13.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

41.05%

-31.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

63.08%

-50.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

70.16%

-50.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

85.34%

-68.33%

Dividends

GLTL.L vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

GLTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, while NIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLTL.L
SPDR Bloomberg 15+ Year Gilt UCITS ETF
5.12%4.77%4.39%2.97%1.63%0.87%1.01%1.43%1.55%1.86%1.99%2.51%
NIO
NIO Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLTL.L and NIO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLTL.L and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer