PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLT5.L vs. EART.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLT5.L is traded in GBp, while EART.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EART.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLT5.L achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than EART.L's -1.29% return.


GLT5.L

1D
0.06%
1M
0.73%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.42%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*

EART.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.82%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
1.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
0.19%5.31%2.14%3.86%-5.44%-1.01%
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.29%2.88%-4.87%6.69%-26.52%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GLT5.L and EART.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.61

The correlation between GLT5.L and EART.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLT5.L vs. EART.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLT5.L
GLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

EART.L
EART.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EART.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EART.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLT5.LEART.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.02

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.14

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

0.30

+4.12

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the EART.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLT5.L and EART.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLT5.LEART.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.11

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.56

+0.88

Drawdowns

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLT5.L drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum EART.L drawdown of -35.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLT5.L and EART.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLT5.LEART.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-35.57%

+24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-5.90%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.20%

-9.43%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-29.22%

+28.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-25.75%

+23.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.70%

-2.01%

Volatility

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) is 1.88%, while Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that GLT5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EART.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLT5.LEART.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

2.56%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

5.57%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

7.06%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

11.21%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.92%

11.21%

-8.29%

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLT5.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EART.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLT5.L vs. EART.L - Dividend Comparison

GLT5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while EART.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.13%4.12%4.43%3.76%1.01%0.19%0.33%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLT5.L and EART.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLT5.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLT5.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EART.L.

GLT5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while EART.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLT5.L and 0.20% for EART.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLT5.L and EART.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer