PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART.L vs. UKG5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EART.L is traded in GBP, while UKG5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UKG5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART.L achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than UKG5.L's 0.48% return.


EART.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
1.07%
5Y*
10Y*

UKG5.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-1.29%2.88%-4.87%6.69%-26.52%-3.52%
UKG5.L
L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
0.48%5.06%2.37%3.91%-5.07%-0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EART.L and UKG5.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.49

The correlation between EART.L and UKG5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EART.L vs. UKG5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EART.L
EART.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EART.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EART.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UKG5.L
UKG5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UKG5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKG5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EART.LUKG5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.33

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.62

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

5.58

-5.28

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EART.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the UKG5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EART.L and UKG5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EART.LUKG5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

1.62

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.52

-1.07

Drawdowns

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, which is greater than UKG5.L's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART.L and UKG5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EART.LUKG5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.57%

-8.78%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-1.87%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.43%

-1.87%

-7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.22%

-0.69%

-28.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-2.40%

-23.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.55%

+2.15%

Volatility

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (UKG5.L) at 0.90%. This indicates that EART.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UKG5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EART.LUKG5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

0.90%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

1.68%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

1.88%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

2.80%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

2.80%

+8.41%

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UKG5.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EART.L vs. UKG5.L - Dividend Comparison

EART.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UKG5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UKG5.L
L&G UK Gilt 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
3.94%3.94%3.66%2.02%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EART.L and UKG5.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UKG5.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UKG5.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EART.L.

EART.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR, while UKG5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EART.L and 0.06% for UKG5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EART.L and UKG5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer