PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EART.L vs. GILS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-0.76%2.88%-4.87%6.69%-26.52%-3.52%
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
-1.19%1.70%-5.79%1.51%-25.53%-1.16%
Different Trading Currencies

EART.L is traded in GBP, while GILS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GILS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EART.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly higher than GILS.L's -1.19% return.


EART.L

1D
0.06%
1M
-3.02%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
0.54%
5Y*
10Y*

GILS.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
-0.45%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-6.49%
10Y*
-3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EART.L vs. GILS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EART.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GILS.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EART.L vs. GILS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EART.L
EART.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EART.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EART.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GILS.L
GILS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GILS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GILS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EART.LGILS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

-0.07

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

-0.04

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

-0.05

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.10

-0.13

+2.22

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EART.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the GILS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EART.L and GILS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EART.LGILS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

-0.07

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.01

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between EART.L and GILS.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EART.L nor GILS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EART.L
Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GILS.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%

Drawdowns

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EART.L drawdown since its inception was -35.57%, smaller than the maximum GILS.L drawdown of -38.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EART.L and GILS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EART.LGILS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.57%

-38.75%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-5.53%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.84%

-35.89%

+7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.63%

-11.75%

-13.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.04%

+0.14%

Volatility

EART.L vs. GILS.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Government Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EART.L) and Lyxor Core UK Government Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GILS.L) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EART.LGILS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.81%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

5.10%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.48%

6.69%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

10.05%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

9.03%

+2.27%