GLRBX vs. EKBAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLRBX (James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund) and EKBAX (Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX returned 5.14%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for EKBAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLRBX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for EKBAX.

Performance

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRBX achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 38.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GLRBX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 5.14%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.78% annualized return.

GLRBX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 6M: 4.75%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

EKBAX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 9.53%
• YTD: 38.34%
• 6M: 37.34%
• 1Y: 62.84%
• 3Y*: 32.50%
• 5Y*: 19.67%
• 10Y*: 16.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund	5.39%	13.16%	12.27%	11.52%	-12.77%	12.69%	1.54%	12.10%	-10.60%	6.03%
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund	38.34%	21.87%	21.75%	22.23%	-13.47%	19.61%	12.66%	32.99%	-5.55%	14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRBX and EKBAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.84

The correlation between GLRBX and EKBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLRBX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRBX

GLRBX Risk / Return Rank: 76
GLRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GLRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GLRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GLRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GLRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EKBAX

EKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
EKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
EKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLRBX	EKBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.47	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	4.23	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.60	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	8.62	-5.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	33.61	-19.43

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the EKBAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRBX and EKBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRBX drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRBX and EKBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRBX	EKBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.59%	-55.64%	+34.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.55%	-7.32%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-23.55%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.73%	-24.84%	+8.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.86%	-32.33%	+15.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	0.00%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-7.97%	+4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.88%	-0.66%

Volatility

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund (GLRBX) is 2.71%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that GLRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRBX	EKBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	9.31%	-6.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.29%	14.86%	-8.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.54%	18.23%	-10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	18.49%	-10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.34%	17.76%	-9.42%

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRBX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRBX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison

GLRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than EKBAX's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund	6.95%	9.61%	5.28%	6.16%	12.50%	6.89%	2.03%	9.49%	7.14%	6.20%	10.05%	11.47%
GLRBX James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Fund	4.73%	4.95%	3.31%	2.05%	5.18%	6.72%	1.14%	1.90%	11.45%	7.69%	1.59%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRBX and EKBAX in my portfolio?

GLRBX and EKBAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLRBX or EKBAX?

EKBAX has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to GLRBX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLRBX dropped -21.59% vs EKBAX's -55.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.