PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLRA.L vs. XDER.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLRA.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap) and XDER.L (Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C) are both REIT funds - GLRA.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while XDER.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRA.L returned 1.35%/yr vs -5.51%/yr for XDER.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLRA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for XDER.L.

Performance

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLRA.L is traded in USD, while XDER.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDER.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRA.L achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than XDER.L's -2.03% return.

GLRA.L

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
6.97%
6M
6.70%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
—

XDER.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
-1.28%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
0.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLRA.L
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap		6.97%10.04%-0.75%11.39%-25.32%30.28%-10.67%-1.08%
XDER.L
Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C		-2.03%19.56%-9.52%19.36%-40.09%9.39%-3.10%5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRA.L and XDER.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019

0.69

The correlation between GLRA.L and XDER.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GLRA.L
XDER.L

Real Estate

99.9%
97.7%

Industrials

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
0.5%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

GLRA.L
99.9%
XDER.L
97.7%

Industrials

GLRA.L
0.0%
XDER.L

-

Financial Services

GLRA.L
0.0%
XDER.L
0.5%

Utilities

GLRA.L
0.0%
XDER.L

-

Basic Materials

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Communication Services

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Energy

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Healthcare

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Technology

GLRA.L

-

XDER.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap

Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with GLRA.L:
GLRA.L vs. VNQGLRA.L vs. VNQIGLRA.L vs. VWRA.LGLRA.L vs. EIMI.LGLRA.L vs. IWDP.LGLRA.L vs. IWDA.LGLRA.L vs. AREG.L
Often compared with XDER.L:
XDER.L vs. VNQXDER.L vs. IPRP.LXDER.L vs. VGSIXXDER.L vs. IDWP.LXDER.L vs. AREG.LXDER.L vs. IWDP.LXDER.L vs. HPRD.L

Return for Risk

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLRA.L
GLRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
XDER.L
XDER.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XDER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GLRA.LXDER.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.93
-0.07

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
0.02

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

-0.07

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

-0.18

+5.10

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the XDER.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRA.L and XDER.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GLRA.LXDER.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

-0.07

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.23

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.00

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.23

-0.15

Drawdowns

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum XDER.L drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRA.L and XDER.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLRA.LXDER.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-55.61%

+17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-18.00%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.24%

-23.51%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.18%

-55.61%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-55.61%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-29.13%

+25.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-15.57%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

7.24%

-4.76%

Volatility

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) is 4.05%, while Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that GLRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDER.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLRA.LXDER.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

6.37%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

14.39%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

17.56%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

24.13%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

21.77%

-0.44%

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDER.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRA.L vs. XDER.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLRA.L nor XDER.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

GLRA.L and XDER.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDER.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDER.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRA.L.

GLRA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XDER.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRA.L and 0.33% for XDER.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLRA.L and XDER.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer