PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLOW vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLOW vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GLOW having a 11.30% return and WNTR slightly lower at 10.75%.


GLOW

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.86%
6M
8.35%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.70%

WNTR

1D
3.26%
1M
8.13%
6M
14.92%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
107.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$210.60K$374.13K$387.50K
$4.02M$3.86M$3.95M

GLOW vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLOW and WNTR is -0.46, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLOW vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLOW
GLOW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLOW vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLOWWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.71

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

6.87

+3.19

GLOW vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLOW and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLOW vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLOW drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOW and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLOWWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-42.65%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-42.65%

+33.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-9.64%

+8.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-20.18%

+18.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

16.81%

-14.58%

Volatility

GLOW vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is 3.45%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that GLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLOWWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

14.85%

-11.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

47.43%

-36.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

54.68%

-41.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

53.42%

-38.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

53.42%

-38.29%

GLOW vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLOW has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLOW vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

GLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GLOW
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
1.24%1.33%1.18%
WNTR
YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF
107.02%58.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLOW and WNTR have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to GLOW (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOW dropped -15.58% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 23.53% for GLOW. On fees, GLOW is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, GLOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 23.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLOW is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 1.24% for GLOW.

GLOW is categorized as Global Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for GLOW and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLOW and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer