GLOW vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GLOW (VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLOW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by VictoryShares, while QQQN is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. GLOW is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. GLOW charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

GLOW vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GLOW

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: 8.35%
• YTD: 11.30%
• 1Y: 23.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.70%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF	$210.60K	$374.13K	$387.50K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GLOW vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF	9.76%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

GLOW vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLOW	QQQN
Technology	27.3%	47.3%
Financial Services	20.1%	-
Healthcare	15.3%	19.9%
Industrials	8.9%	8.7%
Communication Services	7.9%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	13.7%
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.9%
Utilities	4.4%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	1.4%
Energy	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

GLOW vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLOW

GLOW Risk / Return Rank: 74
GLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 78

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLOW vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLOW	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	—	—

Drawdowns

GLOW vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLOW drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOW and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLOW	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	0.00%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	0.00%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	0.00%	-1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLOW	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	0.00%	+13.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	0.00%	+15.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	0.00%	+15.13%

GLOW vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLOW has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLOW vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

GLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GLOW VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF	1.24%	1.33%	1.18%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GLOW or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLOW or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for GLOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLOW or QQQN?

GLOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between GLOW and QQQN?

GLOW is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQN is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for GLOW and 0.18% for QQQN.