GLOSX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
GLOSX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Dec 15, 2005. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A | -2.65% | 41.25% | 11.45% | 16.70% | -9.75% | 23.28% | 17.79% | 23.30% | -16.32% | 21.90% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOSX achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GLOSX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
GLOSX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOSX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLOSX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
GLOSX
FGIAX
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLOSX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.75 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.26 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.61 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | 12.12 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLOSX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLOSX and FGIAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
GLOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A | 11.85% | 11.53% | 7.73% | 1.55% | 6.04% | 21.00% | 0.87% | 0.93% | 10.44% | 1.27% | 1.25% | 0.60% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOSX drawdown since its inception was -54.40%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOSX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLOSX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.40% | -49.35% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -8.29% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -21.08% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.59% | -38.02% | +4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.04% | -3.78% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -7.22% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.78% | +1.02% |
Volatility
GLOSX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that GLOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLOSX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 4.05% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 7.09% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 12.28% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 13.08% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 15.17% | +1.61% |