GLOF vs. WBIG
GLOF (iShares Global Equity Factor ETF) and WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GLOF is passively managed, while WBIG is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLOF returned 12.29%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for WBIG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLOF charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for WBIG.
Performance
GLOF vs. WBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLOF achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than WBIG's 8.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GLOF has outperformed WBIG with an annualized return of 12.29%, while WBIG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.82% annualized return.
GLOF
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 14.18%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
WBIG
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
GLOF vs. WBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 13.19% | 23.92% | 17.49% | 22.38% | -16.97% | 18.68% | 10.00% | 23.21% | -13.70% | 29.86% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 8.66% | -0.39% | 5.87% | -2.68% | -7.68% | 16.04% | -3.30% | 6.85% | -8.46% | 25.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLOF and WBIG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between GLOF and WBIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLOF vs. WBIG — Risk / Return Rank
GLOF
WBIG
GLOF vs. WBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLOF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.88 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | 12.22 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLOF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.99 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.05 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.33 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.15 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
GLOF vs. WBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLOF drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than WBIG's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLOF and WBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLOF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.12% | -25.32% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -5.06% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.12% | -20.20% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -25.32% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -25.32% | -8.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -4.84% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -10.92% | +4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.61% | +0.41% |
Volatility
GLOF vs. WBIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) at 3.43%. This indicates that GLOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLOF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 3.43% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | 6.58% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 9.89% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 12.05% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 11.55% | +5.62% |
GLOF vs. WBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLOF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIG's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLOF vs. WBIG - Dividend Comparison
GLOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than WBIG's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.59% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 1.90% | 1.73% | 2.41% | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.94% | 0.92% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.21% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLOF and WBIG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLOF has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to WBIG (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLOF dropped -34.12% vs WBIG's -25.32%.
On 10-year performance, GLOF leads with 12.29% vs 3.82% for WBIG. On fees, GLOF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, WBIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLOF has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLOF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
GLOF has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.21% for WBIG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GLOF and 1.14% for WBIG.
GLOF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLOF and WBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer