PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLO vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLO vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLO vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLO
Clough Global Opportunities Fund
1.12%23.76%21.83%4.69%-23.78%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
-3.13%16.67%19.03%18.09%-2.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLO achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's -3.13% return.


GLO

1D
3.34%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
1.12%
6M
3.12%
1Y
27.28%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
-3.83%
10Y*
6.50%

SPYI

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.13%
6M
0.26%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLO vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLO
GLO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLO vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLOSPYIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.01

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.53

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.55

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

8.15

+1.93

GLO vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLO and SPYI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLOSPYIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.01

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.00

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between GLO and SPYI is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GLO vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

GLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, less than SPYI's 12.50% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLO
Clough Global Opportunities Fund
10.99%10.62%11.25%12.33%22.32%12.26%9.69%11.12%14.48%10.11%12.63%11.49%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
12.50%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLO vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLO drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLO and SPYI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLOSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.53%

-16.47%

-44.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-11.02%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.62%

-5.03%

-21.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-1.86%

-15.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.09%

+0.56%

Volatility

GLO vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Opportunities Fund (GLO) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 5.08%. This indicates that GLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLOSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

5.08%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

8.27%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

16.22%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

13.12%

+7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

13.12%

+8.14%