GLNK vs. GDOG
GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) and GDOG (Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK) while GDOG tracks the CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLNK charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GDOG.
Performance
GLNK vs. GDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLNK achieves a -33.27% return, which is significantly lower than GDOG's -21.87% return.
GLNK
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- -12.83%
- YTD
- -33.27%
- 6M
- -43.25%
- 1Y
- -59.50%
- 3Y*
- -10.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDOG
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -17.02%
- YTD
- -21.87%
- 6M
- -39.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLNK vs. GDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF | -33.27% | -33.85% |
GDOG Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF | -21.87% | -23.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLNK and GDOG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLNK vs. GDOG — Risk / Return Rank
GLNK
GDOG
GLNK vs. GDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) and Grayscale Dogecoin Trust ETF (GDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLNK | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLNK | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.86 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
GLNK vs. GDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLNK drawdown since its inception was -95.82%, which is greater than GDOG's maximum drawdown of -42.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLNK and GDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLNK | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.82% | -42.91% | -52.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.71% | -41.16% | -54.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -28.48% | -27.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.68% | — | — |
Volatility
GLNK vs. GDOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLNK | GDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.57% | 73.98% | +35.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 164.87% | 73.98% | +90.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.87% | 73.98% | +90.89% |
GLNK vs. GDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLNK has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLNK vs. GDOG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLNK nor GDOG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLNK and GDOG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.
GLNK and GDOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK), while GDOG tracks CoinDesk Dogecoin Blended Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for GLNK and 0.35% for GDOG.
Find the right allocation for GLNK and GDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer