PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLMD vs. SPCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GLMD vs. SPCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLMD achieves a -23.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPCB's 20.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GLMD has underperformed SPCB with an annualized return of -51.88%, while SPCB has yielded a comparatively higher -34.67% annualized return.


GLMD

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-23.78%
6M
-35.00%
1Y
-67.31%
3Y*
-75.82%
5Y*
-74.72%
10Y*
-51.88%

SPCB

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
20.11%
6M
9.91%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
-18.93%
5Y*
-47.40%
10Y*
-34.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLMD vs. SPCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLMD
Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
-23.78%-76.47%-41.58%-93.93%-72.53%-41.48%-46.19%-15.37%-25.36%160.68%
SPCB
SuperCom Ltd.
20.11%87.76%-37.60%-78.30%-67.93%-46.12%66.13%-55.07%-64.71%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GLMD and SPCB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GLMD:

$3.76M

SPCB:

$53.96M

EPS

GLMD:

-$1.93

SPCB:

$0.94

PB Ratio

GLMD:

0.24

SPCB:

1.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

GLMD:

$0.00

SPCB:

$27.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GLMD:

$0.00

SPCB:

$15.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

GLMD:

-$8.49M

SPCB:

$4.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLMD vs. SPCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLMD
GLMD Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GLMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SPCB
SPCB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLMD vs. SPCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) and SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLMDSPCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.08

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

0.16

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

0.27

-1.44

GLMD vs. SPCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the SPCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLMD and SPCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLMD vs. SPCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLMD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SPCB drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLMD and SPCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLMDSPCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-99.98%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.86%

-45.37%

-34.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.84%

-86.81%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.92%

-99.03%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-99.69%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-99.91%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.07%

-91.50%

+15.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.02%

25.86%

+32.16%

Volatility

GLMD vs. SPCB - Volatility Comparison

Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GLMD) has a higher volatility of 49.40% compared to SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB) at 24.50%. This indicates that GLMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLMDSPCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.40%

24.50%

+24.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.20%

46.74%

+27.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.71%

68.86%

+24.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.70%

122.49%

+44.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.16%

114.77%

+23.39%

Dividends

GLMD vs. SPCB - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLMD nor SPCB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GLMD vs. SPCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and SuperCom Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
7.48M
(GLMD) Total Revenue
(SPCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GLMD and SPCB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLMD has higher volatility (49.40%) compared to SPCB (24.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLMD dropped -99.99% vs SPCB's -99.98%.

SPCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLMD and SPCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer