GLLSX vs. GMAQX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLLSX (abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) and GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, GLLSX returned 29.36%/yr vs 34.94%/yr for GMAQX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLLSX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for GMAQX.

Performance

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLLSX achieves a 46.58% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 57.96% return.

GLLSX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 11.34%
• YTD: 46.58%
• 6M: 50.65%
• 1Y: 88.61%
• 3Y*: 29.36%
• 5Y*: 18.30%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

GMAQX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 28.51%
• YTD: 57.96%
• 6M: 64.09%
• 1Y: 93.54%
• 3Y*: 34.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	46.58%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	18.55%
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	57.96%	32.09%	0.62%	27.41%	-32.38%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GLLSX and GMAQX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	0.89

The correlation between GLLSX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLLSX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

GMAQX

GMAQX Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GMAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GMAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GMAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLLSX	GMAQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.14	4.51	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.78	6.03	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.94	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.17	6.82	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.54	26.25	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLLSX Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is comparable to the GMAQX Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLLSX and GMAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLLSX	GMAQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14	4.51	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.81	-0.11

Drawdowns

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLLSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum GMAQX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLLSX and GMAQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLLSX	GMAQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.59%	-41.97%	+9.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.39%	-13.77%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.95%	-19.64%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-16.74%	+8.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	3.57%	+0.04%

Volatility

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) is 9.95%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that GLLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLLSX	GMAQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.95%	12.47%	-2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.05%	18.53%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.43%	20.81%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.09%	17.22%	+0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	17.22%	+0.58%

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLLSX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLLSX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison

GLLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GMAQX's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.28%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	5.97%	9.43%	32.28%	6.76%	4.94%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLLSX and GMAQX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GLLSX and GMAQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GLLSX or GMAQX?

GMAQX has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to GLLSX (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLLSX dropped -32.59% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 4.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.