GLIX vs. POWR
GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) and POWR (iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. GLIX is actively managed, while POWR is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for POWR.
Performance
GLIX vs. POWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLIX having a 12.89% return and POWR slightly higher at 13.53%.
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWR
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.73%
GLIX vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 12.89% | 0.49% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 13.53% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIX and POWR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIX vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank
GLIX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
POWR
GLIX vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLIX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLIX vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIX drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIX and POWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -65.98% | +58.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -5.61% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -18.03% | +16.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.55% | — |
Volatility
GLIX vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIX | POWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 16.85% | -4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 22.99% | -11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 25.49% | -13.52% |
GLIX vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLIX vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison
GLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than POWR's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 2.01% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWR iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF | 5.68% | 7.56% | 4.36% | 4.16% | 4.82% | 3.94% | 3.96% | 5.71% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 2.75% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIX and POWR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.
POWR has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 2.01% for GLIX.
They also come from different issuers: Lazard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GLIX and 0.40% for POWR.
Find the right allocation for GLIX and POWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer