PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLIFX vs. VMVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.


GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%

VMVFX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.52%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.94%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
8.43%12.74%13.38%7.82%-4.48%23.74%-3.99%23.28%-1.79%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIFX and VMVFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.69

The correlation between GLIFX and VMVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLIFX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVFX
VMVFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VMVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLIFXVMVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.08

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

8.13

-2.25

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VMVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIFX and VMVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLIFXVMVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.92

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.76

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.82

+0.02

Drawdowns

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum VMVFX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and VMVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLIFXVMVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-33.09%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-6.27%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-7.96%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.15%

-13.02%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-33.09%

+3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

-0.18%

-5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-2.83%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.60%

+1.06%

Volatility

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 1.94%. This indicates that GLIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLIFXVMVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

1.94%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

5.17%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

6.81%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.99%

10.76%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

12.48%

+0.85%

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLIFX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison

GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than VMVFX's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
VMVFX
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares
9.20%9.98%3.77%3.05%4.96%12.73%2.02%5.12%7.27%2.30%2.71%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLIFX and VMVFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VMVFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIFX dropped -29.65% vs VMVFX's -33.09%.

VMVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIFX and VMVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer