GLIFX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
GLIFX is managed by Lazard. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLIFX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
GLIFX
CSUIX
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 1.67 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.21 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.42 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 10.58 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.67 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.64 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.53 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.58 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIFX and CSUIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -52.01% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -7.99% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.15% | -20.01% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -35.01% | +5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -4.36% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -8.21% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.82% | +0.34% |
Volatility
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that GLIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.24% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 6.90% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 11.49% | -0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 12.86% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 14.88% | -1.63% |