GLIFX vs. CSUIX
GLIFX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX returned 9.95%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for CSUIX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GLIFX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.
Performance
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIFX achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 12.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GLIFX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.
GLIFX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 13.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.84%
CSUIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 16.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 7.62% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 12.09% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIFX and CSUIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GLIFX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIFX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
GLIFX
CSUIX
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.95 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 9.33 | -4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIFX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIFX and CSUIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -52.01% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -5.96% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.00% | -11.74% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.15% | -20.01% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.65% | -35.01% | +5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -2.16% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -8.11% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 1.88% | +1.45% |
Volatility
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) is 2.38%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that GLIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 2.53% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 8.16% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 10.15% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 12.98% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 14.87% | -1.69% |
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIFX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLIFX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
GLIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than CSUIX's 7.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.95% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 7.29% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIFX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSUIX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to GLIFX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIFX dropped -29.65% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.
CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLIFX and CSUIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer