PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. LISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio R6 (LISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than LISIX's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has outperformed LISIX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while LISIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.43% annualized return.


GLFOX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
7.81%
6M
7.73%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
10.06%

LISIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
3.76%
YTD
11.51%
6M
13.29%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.81%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%
LISIX
Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio R6
11.51%25.70%-1.42%17.08%-16.89%6.07%10.58%21.56%-10.48%27.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and LISIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between GLFOX and LISIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. LISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LISIX
LISIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
LISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio R6 (LISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLFOXLISIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.44

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

2.14

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.72

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.50

6.92

-0.42

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the LISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and LISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLFOXLISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.29

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.43

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.35

+0.48

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum LISIX drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and LISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLFOXLISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-55.70%

+26.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-12.28%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-16.26%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-32.52%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-36.01%

+6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

-0.48%

-4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-10.49%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.06%

-0.42%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) is 4.50%, while Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio R6 (LISIX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that GLFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLFOXLISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

5.76%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

12.81%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

15.05%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

17.58%

-6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.34%

17.29%

-3.95%

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LISIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLFOX vs. LISIX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, less than LISIX's 25.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
6.07%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
LISIX
Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio R6
25.80%28.77%13.47%1.46%1.39%8.82%1.01%1.85%9.01%1.30%1.60%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLFOX and LISIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LISIX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to GLFOX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs LISIX's -55.70%.

GLFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLFOX and LISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer