GLDY vs. AIPO
GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. GLDY is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
GLDY vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDY achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
GLDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -2.30% | 15.05% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDY and AIPO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDY vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
GLDY
AIPO
GLDY vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 2.36 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
GLDY vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDY drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, smaller than the maximum AIPO drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDY and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -17.31% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -1.12% | -12.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -4.38% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | — | — |
Volatility
GLDY vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 34.09% | -14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 34.09% | -14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 34.09% | -14.51% |
GLDY vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDY vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.42%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 46.42% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDY and AIPO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.
GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
GLDY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDY and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for GLDY and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer