GLDW vs. YCS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). GLDW is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

GLDW vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a -10.06% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.96% return.

GLDW

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: -4.71%
• 6M: -16.30%
• YTD: -10.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.12%
• 6M: 7.23%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 1Y: 29.30%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 24.31%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	-10.06%	9.36%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	10.96%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and YCS is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 72
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDW	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.20	—

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.25%	-49.56%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.99%	-0.41%	-30.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-19.81%	+7.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.57%	16.60%	+19.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.57%	21.09%	+15.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.57%	18.71%	+17.86%

GLDW vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDW vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.53%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	25.53%	3.75%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDW and YCS in my portfolio?

GLDW and YCS have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLDW or YCS?

On fees, GLDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDW or YCS?

GLDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDW or YCS?

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 25.53%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between GLDW and YCS?

GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 1.00% for YCS.