GLDW vs. SHNY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and SHNY (MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while SHNY is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SHNY.

Performance

GLDW vs. SHNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly higher than SHNY's -34.20% return.

GLDW

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: -8.13%
• 6M: -12.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SHNY

• 1D: -5.70%
• 1M: -27.06%
• YTD: -34.20%
• 6M: -42.91%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 49.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. SHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	-8.13%	9.36%
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	-34.20%	23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and SHNY is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. SHNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SHNY

SHNY Risk / Return Rank: 13
SHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. SHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN (SHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLDW	SHNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.49	—

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. SHNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -30.07%, smaller than the maximum SHNY drawdown of -65.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and SHNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	SHNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.07%	-65.54%	+35.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-65.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-65.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.51%	-65.38%	+35.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.30%	-15.65%	+5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	SHNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	74.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.17%	81.62%	-44.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.17%	59.25%	-22.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.17%	59.25%	-22.08%

GLDW vs. SHNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SHNY's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLDW vs. SHNY - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.10%, while SHNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	23.10%	3.75%
SHNY MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLDW and SHNY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GLDW and SHNY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GLDW or SHNY?

On fees, SHNY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLDW or SHNY?

SHNY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLDW or SHNY?

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 23.10%, compared with 0.00% for SHNY.

What is the main difference between GLDW and SHNY?

GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SHNY is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.95% for SHNY.