GLDW vs. IPDP
GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. GLDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
GLDW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -14.00% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.59% | 0.00% | -23.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.51% | 0.00% | -22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | 0.00% | -8.93% |
Volatility
GLDW vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.90% | 0.00% | +36.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 0.00% | +36.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 0.00% | +36.90% |
GLDW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GLDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for GLDW and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer