GLDW vs. DZZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ).

GLDW and DZZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Oct 30, 2025. DZZ is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008.

Performance

GLDW vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDW vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	10.77%	7.63%
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	-30.86%	-36.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -30.86% return.

GLDW

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -13.44%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DZZ

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 9.48%
• YTD: -30.86%
• 6M: 75.80%
• 1Y: 62.84%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: -3.13%
• 10Y*: -8.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

GLDW

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF

DZZ

DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes

Return for Risk

GLDW vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DZZ

DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDW	DZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	-0.21	+1.51

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and DZZ is -0.43. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

GLDW vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.88%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF	11.88%	3.75%
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and DZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDW	DZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-96.64%	+73.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-74.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.01%	-93.53%	+78.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-82.19%	+76.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	43.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLDW	DZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	126.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.16%	168.01%	-126.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.16%	82.52%	-41.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.16%	63.36%	-22.20%