PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDW vs. COPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDW vs. COPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GLDW

1D
-1.20%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
1.00%
6M
3.47%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COPZ

1D
-6.96%
1M
32.69%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW vs. COPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLDW and COPZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDW vs. COPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDW vs. COPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDWCOPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.17

+0.58

Drawdowns

GLDW vs. COPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum COPZ drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and COPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDWCOPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.59%

-49.79%

+26.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.51%

-21.65%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-28.52%

+19.59%

Volatility

GLDW vs. COPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDWCOPZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.90%

104.89%

-67.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

104.89%

-67.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.90%

104.89%

-67.99%

GLDW vs. COPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COPZ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDW vs. COPZ - Dividend Comparison

GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.48%, while COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLDW and COPZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COPZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COPZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.

GLDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while COPZ is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDW and 0.95% for COPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDW and COPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer