GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L
GLDW.L (WisdomTree Core Physical Gold) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDW.L returned 19.87%/yr vs 19.87%/yr for EGLN.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLDW.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDW.L is traded in GBp, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLDW.L having a 3.96% return and EGLN.L slightly higher at 4.06%.
GLDW.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 33.71%
- 3Y*
- 28.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDW.L WisdomTree Core Physical Gold | 3.96% | 53.57% | 28.18% | 7.26% | 11.82% | 9.07% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.06% | 53.83% | 28.21% | 7.18% | 11.48% | 8.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW.L and EGLN.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between GLDW.L and EGLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW.L
EGLN.L
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDW.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.93 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 5.09 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.91 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum EGLN.L drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW.L and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -22.58% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | -17.43% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -17.43% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.86% | -17.43% | -0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -15.86% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -6.05% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 6.61% | +0.04% |
Volatility
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) is 5.09%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that GLDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW.L | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 5.54% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 20.07% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 23.22% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 16.35% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.11% | +0.83% |
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDW.L vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDW.L nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GLDW.L and EGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLDW.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.
GLDW.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while EGLN.L is Gold. GLDW.L tracks Gold, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDW.L and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for GLDW.L and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer