PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. XEON.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDM is traded in USD, while XEON.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XEON.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -7.15% return, which is significantly lower than XEON.DE's -1.60% return.


GLDM

1D
-0.23%
1M
-5.00%
6M
-12.61%
YTD
-7.15%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.27%

XEON.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.13%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
-1.60%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
1.16%
ALL TIME*
-0.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-7.15%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-1.60%15.43%-2.15%6.56%-5.55%-8.43%9.15%-2.59%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and XEON.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XEON.DE
XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMXEON.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.07

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

0.14

+1.61

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and XEON.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum XEON.DE drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and XEON.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMXEON.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.27%

-40.00%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.27%

-4.95%

-21.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.27%

-7.52%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.27%

-19.76%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.76%

-20.50%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-21.76%

+15.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

2.42%

+8.80%

Volatility

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 1.22%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMXEON.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

1.22%

+5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.04%

4.48%

+19.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.86%

6.26%

+21.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

7.61%

+10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

7.25%

+9.82%

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLDM and XEON.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDM nor XEON.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and XEON.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDM and XEON.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while XEON.DE is Money Market. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and XEON.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer