PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 13.71% return.


GLDM

1D
0.98%
1M
-10.71%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-10.19%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*

SPYD

1D
0.75%
1M
2.24%
YTD
13.71%
6M
13.22%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.69%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
13.71%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and SPYD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.92

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

8.40

-6.18

GLDM vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.11%

-46.42%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.11%

-7.05%

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.11%

-16.13%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-22.25%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.39%

-0.88%

-24.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-6.14%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.33%

2.44%

+6.89%

Volatility

GLDM vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 3.62%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

3.62%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

8.05%

+16.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.50%

11.87%

+15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.07%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

19.78%

-2.73%

GLDM vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.22%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and SPYD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to SPYD (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -26.11% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.62% vs 8.08% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SPYD is S&P 500. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer