GLDM vs. PDBC
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. GLDM is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDM returned 17.89%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
GLDM vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 32.98% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 32.98%
- 6M
- 33.41%
- 1Y
- 41.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
GLDM vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.30% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 32.98% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and PDBC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
PDBC
GLDM vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDM | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 5.37 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 11.80 | -7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDM | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.19 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.61 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.22 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -49.52% | +27.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -7.67% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -13.95% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -27.63% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -6.82% | -12.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -23.19% | +16.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 3.48% | +4.48% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 5.65%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 6.00% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 16.03% | +7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 18.82% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 19.15% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 17.79% | -0.90% |
GLDM vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDM vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.89% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and PDBC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to GLDM (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.89% vs 11.71% for PDBC. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer