PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.17% return.


GLDM

1D
0.11%
1M
-10.20%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-2.40%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-14.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and IDMO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.23

The correlation between GLDM and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDM vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDM
IDMO

Basic Materials

100.0%
10.2%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Energy

-

1.9%

Financial Services

-

42.4%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Industrials

-

22.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

5.3%

Utilities

-

8.4%

Basic Materials

GLDM
100.0%
IDMO
10.2%

Communication Services

GLDM

-

IDMO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GLDM

-

IDMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

GLDM

-

IDMO
2.5%

Energy

GLDM

-

IDMO
1.9%

Financial Services

GLDM

-

IDMO
42.4%

Healthcare

GLDM

-

IDMO
1.2%

Industrials

GLDM

-

IDMO
22.6%

Real Estate

GLDM

-

IDMO
2.0%

Technology

GLDM

-

IDMO
5.3%

Utilities

GLDM

-

IDMO
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.89

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

7.64

-4.77

GLDM vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.35%

-39.38%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.35%

-12.31%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-12.65%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-27.07%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.96%

-1.92%

-20.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-9.74%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.44%

3.04%

+5.40%

Volatility

GLDM vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 7.73% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

7.92%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.93%

16.02%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.15%

17.92%

+9.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

18.03%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

18.18%

-1.20%

GLDM vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and IDMO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -24.35% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 17.41% vs 15.50% for IDMO. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while IDMO is Momentum. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer