GLDM vs. IBIT
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GLDM returned 22.58% vs -39.67% for IBIT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
GLDM vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -19.59%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -39.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -2.40% | 64.20% | 29.59% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and IBIT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
IBIT
GLDM vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDM | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.85 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.78 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | -1.37 | +4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -24.35%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.35% | -52.11% | +27.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.35% | -52.11% | +27.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.96% | -49.45% | +27.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -16.53% | +10.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 29.64% | -21.20% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) is 7.73%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that GLDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 12.07% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 34.45% | -10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.15% | 44.10% | -16.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 50.26% | -32.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 50.26% | -33.28% |
GLDM vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDM vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDM nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and IBIT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to GLDM (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -24.35% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, GLDM leads with 22.58% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 22.58% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
GLDM and IBIT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.25% for IBIT.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer