GLDM vs. AVIV
GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) and AVIV (Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while AVIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. GLDM is passively managed, while AVIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLDM returned 26.73%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for AVIV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDM charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVIV.
Performance
GLDM vs. AVIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a -7.15% return, which is significantly lower than AVIV's 10.88% return.
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- 6M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- -7.15%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.27%
AVIV
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 29.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
GLDM vs. AVIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -7.15% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | 5.94% |
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF | 10.88% | 41.80% | 4.30% | 18.47% | -8.26% | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDM and AVIV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between GLDM and AVIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDM vs. AVIV — Risk / Return Rank
GLDM
AVIV
GLDM vs. AVIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDM | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.73 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 10.47 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDM vs. AVIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum AVIV drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and AVIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDM | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -27.69% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.27% | -10.78% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.27% | -14.13% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.76% | -1.95% | -23.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.48% | -5.03% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.22% | 2.80% | +8.42% |
Volatility
GLDM vs. AVIV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV) at 3.70%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDM | AVIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 3.70% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.04% | 12.68% | +11.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.86% | 14.77% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.85% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 16.85% | +0.22% |
GLDM vs. AVIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AVIV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDM vs. AVIV - Dividend Comparison
GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF | 2.56% | 3.01% | 3.46% | 3.64% | 2.84% | 0.57% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDM and AVIV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to AVIV (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -26.27% vs AVIV's -27.69%.
On 3-year performance, GLDM leads with 26.73% vs 19.51% for AVIV. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, AVIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 26.73% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVIV.
AVIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
GLDM is categorized as Gold, while AVIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.25% for AVIV.
AVIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDM and AVIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer