GLDI vs. GLDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW).
GLDI and GLDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDI is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2013. GLDW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Oct 30, 2025.
Performance
GLDI vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDI vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 3.48% | 7.31% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 10.77% | 7.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than GLDW's 10.77% return.
GLDI
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
GLDW
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -13.44%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDI vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
GLDW
GLDI vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.30 | -0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and GLDW is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLDI vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.19%, more than GLDW's 11.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 20.19% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 11.88% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and GLDW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -23.59% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -15.01% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -5.21% | -8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility
GLDI vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 41.16% | -27.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 41.16% | -30.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 41.16% | -29.92% |