GLDI vs. GLDW
GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. GLDI is passively managed, while GLDW is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GLDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
GLDI vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's -10.18% return.
GLDI
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.85%
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -21.62%
- YTD
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.09M | $8.22M | $7.58M | |
| $259.24K | $286.30K | $479.68K |
GLDI vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | -4.75% | 8.53% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -10.18% | 9.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and GLDW is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. GLDW — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
GLDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLDI vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDW drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -32.55% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.54% | -31.08% | +17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -13.26% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | — | — |
Volatility
GLDI vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 35.85% | -19.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 35.85% | -24.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 35.85% | -24.20% |
GLDI vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDI vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.14%, less than GLDW's 26.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | 26.14% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 26.73% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI and GLDW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 26.73%, compared with 26.14% for GLDI.
GLDI is categorized as Gold, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLDI and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for GLDI and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer