PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDI.L vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
2.69%61.04%6.19%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
6.32%19.36%3.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDI.L achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 6.32% return.


GLDI.L

1D
2.61%
1M
-9.91%
YTD
2.69%
6M
13.27%
1Y
37.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAVE

1D
3.29%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.40%
1Y
35.92%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLDI.L vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDI.L
GLDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDI.LPAVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

1.61

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

2.30

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.90

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.90

10.73

-1.82

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDI.L and PAVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDI.LPAVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

1.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

0.63

+1.46

Correlation

The correlation between GLDI.L and PAVE is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

GLDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%, more than PAVE's 0.86% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLDI.L
IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP
11.85%9.15%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.86%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Drawdowns

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDI.L drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI.L and PAVE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDI.LPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-44.08%

+27.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-12.56%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.11%

-8.70%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-6.30%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.39%

+0.82%

Volatility

GLDI.L vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Gold+ Yield ETP (GLDI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.74%. This indicates that GLDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLDI.LPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

7.74%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

13.97%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.08%

22.40%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

21.42%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

24.41%

-5.57%