PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

GLDD.TO (BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF) and CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDD.TO is a Inverse Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. GLDD.TO is actively managed, while CHPS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDD.TO returned -28.84%/yr vs 30.44%/yr for CHPS.TO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF (GLDD.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDD.TO achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS.TO's 74.01% return.

GLDD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
27.00%
YTD
1.97%
6M
3.47%
1Y
-40.89%
3Y*
-39.58%
5Y*
-28.84%
10Y*
-21.65%

CHPS.TO

1D
4.14%
1M
13.32%
YTD
74.01%
6M
73.30%
1Y
120.10%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
30.44%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GLDD.TO
BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF		1.97%-64.15%-33.44%-15.90%-4.30%-5.21%
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF		74.01%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%23.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDD.TO and CHPS.TO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Often compared with CHPS.TO:
CHPS.TO vs. SMHCHPS.TO vs. XCHP.TOCHPS.TO vs. CHPS-U.TOCHPS.TO vs. CHPSCHPS.TO vs. XEQT.TOCHPS.TO vs. CIAI.TOCHPS.TO vs. QQC.TO

Return for Risk

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLDD.TO
GLDD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLDD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF (GLDD.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GLDD.TOCHPS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.76
3.43

-4.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.07
3.66

-4.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.51

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

9.21

-9.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

26.33

-27.26

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDD.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDD.TO and CHPS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than CHPS.TO's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDD.TO and CHPS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLDD.TOCHPS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.33%

-48.16%

-51.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.45%

-13.35%

-52.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.50%

-37.49%

-51.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.20%

-48.16%

-42.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.88%

0.00%

-98.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-13.78%

-69.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.02%

4.63%

+39.39%

Volatility

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF (GLDD.TO) is 16.89%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a volatility of 18.23%. This indicates that GLDD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLDD.TOCHPS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.89%

18.23%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.86%

29.35%

+16.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.22%

35.87%

+18.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.71%

34.86%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.66%

34.78%

+14.88%

Dividends

GLDD.TO vs. CHPS.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLDD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF		0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
GLDD.TO
BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GLDD.TO and CHPS.TO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDD.TO is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while CHPS.TO is Semiconductors.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDD.TO and CHPS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer