PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 13.12%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.


GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and XLE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.16

The correlation between GLD and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLD vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
XLE

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
XLE

-

Communication Services

GLD

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

XLE

-

Energy

GLD

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

GLD

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

GLD

-

XLE

-

Industrials

GLD

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

GLD

-

XLE

-

Technology

GLD

-

XLE

-

Utilities

GLD

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.75

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

10.92

-6.77

GLD vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.21

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.79

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.35

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.31

+0.29

Drawdowns

GLD vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-71.26%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

-12.05%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-20.14%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-26.04%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-66.81%

+44.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.75%

-6.15%

-11.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-17.98%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

4.14%

+3.59%

Volatility

GLD vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.51%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

8.25%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.16%

16.58%

+6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.61%

20.53%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

26.02%

-8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

29.59%

-13.64%

GLD vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and XLE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.22% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while XLE is Energy Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer