GLD vs. SH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.80%/yr vs -12.64%/yr for SH. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.

Performance

GLD vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed SH with an annualized return of 12.80%, while SH has yielded a comparatively lower -12.64% annualized return.

GLD

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: -8.06%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 28.10%
• 3Y*: 29.53%
• 5Y*: 17.47%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

SH

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: -5.94%
• 6M: -5.34%
• 1Y: -15.86%
• 3Y*: -12.35%
• 5Y*: -8.66%
• 10Y*: -12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	-0.02%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	-4.15%	24.81%	17.86%	-1.94%	12.81%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-5.94%	-11.35%	-13.52%	-14.80%	18.98%	-24.21%	-25.09%	-22.12%	4.93%	-17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and SH is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006	-0.06

The correlation between GLD and SH shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.06 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLD vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLD	SH
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	91.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GLD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 29
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLD	SH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	-1.32	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	-1.91	+3.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.79	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	-0.88	+2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	-1.61	+5.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLD vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the SH Sharpe Ratio of -1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLD	SH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	-1.32	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	-0.51	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	-0.70	+1.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	-0.58	+1.18

Drawdowns

GLD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and SH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLD	SH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-94.66%	+49.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.10%	-18.16%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.10%	-38.82%	+18.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.03%	-44.53%	+23.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.00%	-76.12%	+54.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.10%	-94.50%	+74.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-67.74%	+51.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.91%	10.00%	-2.09%

Volatility

GLD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.71%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLD	SH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	3.71%	+1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.47%	9.31%	+14.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.86%	12.10%	+14.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.07%	16.88%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	18.03%	-2.03%

GLD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.41%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLD and SH in my portfolio?

GLD and SH have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLD or SH?

GLD has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SH (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs SH's -94.66%.

Which ETF is better, GLD or SH?

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.80% vs -12.64% for SH. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLD or SH?

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.80% return vs -12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLD or SH?

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLD or SH?

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

What is the main difference between GLD and SH?

GLD is categorized as Gold, while SH is Inverse Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.90% for SH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.