PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. MRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than MRSH's -8.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.15% annualized return and MRSH not far behind at 11.75%.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

MRSH

1D
0.32%
1M
4.74%
YTD
-8.15%
6M
-8.49%
1Y
-20.92%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
-8.15%-11.26%13.75%16.15%-3.45%50.83%6.86%42.33%-0.14%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and MRSH is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

-0.01

The correlation between GLD and MRSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MRSH
MRSH Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.85

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.80

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

-1.40

+4.21

GLD vs. MRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the MRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and MRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and MRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-67.46%

+21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-27.01%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-34.36%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-34.36%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-35.80%

+11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-29.62%

+7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-17.41%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

15.50%

-7.01%

Volatility

GLD vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) at 6.91%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

6.91%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

19.10%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

23.47%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

20.20%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

20.94%

-4.86%

Dividends

GLD vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRSH
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc
2.13%1.85%1.44%1.37%1.36%1.15%1.57%1.56%1.98%1.76%1.92%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and MRSH have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to MRSH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs MRSH's -67.46%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and MRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer