GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - GLCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GLCC.TO returned 60.20% vs 2.79% for HPYM.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLCC.TO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HPYM.TO.

Performance

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCC.TO achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than HPYM.TO's -1.25% return.

GLCC.TO

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 6M: 4.96%
• 1Y: 60.20%
• 3Y*: 40.99%
• 5Y*: 21.30%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

HPYM.TO

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: -1.25%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: 2.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	-0.45%	137.43%	33.88%
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	-1.25%	6.72%	-0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.16

Return for Risk

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

HPYM.TO

HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLCC.TO	HPYM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.62	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	0.90	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.11	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	0.73	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.69	2.05	+3.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLCC.TO	HPYM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	0.62	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.37	-0.37

Drawdowns

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLCC.TO	HPYM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.12%	-6.19%	-64.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.86%	-3.85%	-25.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.43%	-2.71%	-20.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.43%	-1.94%	-32.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.61%	1.36%	+9.25%

Volatility

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.96% compared to Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) at 2.02%. This indicates that GLCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLCC.TO	HPYM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.96%	2.02%	+12.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.13%	3.28%	+30.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.70%	4.53%	+37.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.94%	5.61%	+26.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.95%	5.61%	+26.34%

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCC.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLCC.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, less than HPYM.TO's 9.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	8.69%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units	9.38%	9.01%	8.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO in my portfolio?

GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLCC.TO or HPYM.TO?

On fees, HPYM.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLCC.TO or HPYM.TO?

HPYM.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLCC.TO.

What is the main difference between GLCC.TO and HPYM.TO?

GLCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLCC.TO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.