PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GKAT vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GKAT vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.70% return.


GKAT

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and SGOV is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GKAT vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GKAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GKAT vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GKATSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

194.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

396.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,438.60

GKAT vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GKATSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-0.03%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

0.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-0.00%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

GKAT vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GKATSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

0.19%

+12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

0.24%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

0.24%

+12.24%

GKAT vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GKAT vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GKAT
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
0.46%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GKAT and SGOV have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.46% for GKAT.

GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.09% for SGOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GKAT and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer