GKAT vs. PCLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GKAT is a Global Equities fund managed by Scharf Investments, while PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PCLO.

Performance

GKAT vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than PCLO's 2.15% return.

GKAT

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCLO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	6.44%	5.93%
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	2.15%	2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and PCLO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

GKAT vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GKAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLO

PCLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GKAT vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GKAT	PCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.81	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	10.10	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.70	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	19.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	117.16	—

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than PCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and PCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GKAT	PCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-0.76%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-0.02%	-3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-0.03%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GKAT	PCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	0.90%	+11.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.48%	1.14%	+11.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.48%	1.14%	+11.34%

GKAT vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

GKAT vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than PCLO's 5.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	0.46%	0.24%	0.00%
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF	5.24%	5.53%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GKAT and PCLO in my portfolio?

GKAT and PCLO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GKAT or PCLO?

On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GKAT or PCLO?

PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GKAT or PCLO?

PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.46% for GKAT.

What is the main difference between GKAT and PCLO?

GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while PCLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.29% for PCLO.