GISOX vs. HLMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX).
GISOX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2015. HLMSX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Mar 25, 2007.
Performance
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GISOX Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund | -4.04% | 9.82% | -10.00% | 14.58% | -37.61% | 24.41% | 38.16% | 31.57% | -17.66% | 36.78% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | -5.34% | 14.87% | -6.92% | 11.78% | -24.50% | 12.82% | 18.51% | 29.45% | -17.65% | 34.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GISOX achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly higher than HLMSX's -5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GISOX has outperformed HLMSX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while HLMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
GISOX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -3.60%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 1.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.95%
HLMSX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.34%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GISOX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GISOX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank
GISOX
HLMSX
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GISOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 0.61 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.08 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.40 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 1.03 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GISOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.04 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.35 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.32 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GISOX and HLMSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison
GISOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than HLMSX's 4.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GISOX Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.10% | 8.61% | 0.21% | 0.14% | 2.76% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio | 4.27% | 4.04% | 1.17% | 1.00% | 1.83% | 2.82% | 0.03% | 0.52% | 7.56% | 1.13% | 4.37% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GISOX drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum HLMSX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GISOX and HLMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GISOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -60.77% | +12.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -10.59% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.98% | -38.22% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | -38.22% | -9.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.86% | -19.20% | -15.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -13.24% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.18% | -0.01% |
Volatility
GISOX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 5.07%. This indicates that GISOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GISOX | HLMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 5.07% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 8.35% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 13.26% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 14.90% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 14.86% | +3.73% |