PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GISOX vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GISOX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GISOX achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GISOX has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 7.93%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


GISOX

1D
-1.12%
1M
2.38%
YTD
20.07%
6M
22.99%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*
7.93%

IWM

1D
0.93%
1M
4.43%
YTD
18.69%
6M
19.57%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
11.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GISOX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GISOX
Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund
20.07%9.82%-10.00%14.58%-37.61%24.41%38.16%31.57%-17.66%36.78%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
18.69%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GISOX and IWM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.64

The correlation between GISOX and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GISOX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GISOX
GISOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GISOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GISOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GISOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GISOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GISOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GISOX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GISOXIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

2.27

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

3.12

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.97

-2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.79

14.12

-9.33

GISOX vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GISOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GISOX and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GISOXIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.27

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.29

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.48

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Drawdowns

GISOX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GISOX drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GISOX and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GISOXIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-59.05%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-11.03%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.45%

-27.50%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.98%

-31.91%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-41.13%

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.50%

-0.13%

-18.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-10.77%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

3.10%

+1.05%

Volatility

GISOX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund (GISOX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GISOXIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.56%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.35%

13.52%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.12%

19.14%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

22.52%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

23.04%

-4.19%

GISOX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GISOX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GISOX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

GISOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than IWM's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GISOX
Grandeur Peak International Stalwarts Fund
0.42%0.50%0.45%0.54%0.10%8.61%0.21%0.14%2.76%1.38%0.29%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.87%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GISOX and IWM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GISOX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to IWM (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GISOX dropped -47.98% vs IWM's -59.05%.

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GISOX and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer