GIPR vs. PFLT
GIPR (Generation Income Properties, Inc.) and PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.) are both stocks. GIPR operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while PFLT operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, GIPR returned -72.81%/yr vs -4.27%/yr for PFLT. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIPR vs. PFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIPR achieves a -88.52% return, which is significantly lower than PFLT's -18.83% return.
GIPR
- 1D
- 8.22%
- 1M
- -58.16%
- 6M
- -89.43%
- YTD
- -88.52%
- 1Y
- -94.84%
- 3Y*
- -72.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -60.70%
PFLT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -21.14%
- YTD
- -18.83%
- 1Y
- -23.65%
- 3Y*
- -4.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $448.16K | $725.01K | $3.94M | |
| $8.63M | $9.40M | $9.33M |
GIPR vs. PFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPR Generation Income Properties, Inc. | -88.52% | -64.78% | -51.11% | -9.17% | -14.58% | -27.58% |
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | -18.83% | -4.17% | 0.62% | 23.05% | -5.53% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIPR and PFLT is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2021 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
GIPR:
$405.43K
PFLT:
$688.57M
GIPR:
-$1.95
PFLT:
$1.79
GIPR:
0.40
PFLT:
2.00
GIPR:
$9.74M
PFLT:
$229.78M
GIPR:
$0.00
PFLT:
$45.40M
GIPR:
$5.00M
PFLT:
$38.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIPR vs. PFLT — Risk / Return Rank
GIPR
PFLT
GIPR vs. PFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIPR | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.83 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.96 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.97 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIPR vs. PFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIPR drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than PFLT's maximum drawdown of -69.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIPR and PFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIPR | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -69.77% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.52% | -25.25% | -71.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.59% | -28.44% | -70.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.89% | -27.61% | -71.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.69% | -8.46% | -45.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.81% | 12.29% | +54.52% |
Volatility
GIPR vs. PFLT - Volatility Comparison
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) has a higher volatility of 42.88% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) at 6.65%. This indicates that GIPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIPR | PFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.88% | 6.65% | +36.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.90% | 18.40% | +87.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 153.77% | 22.03% | +131.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.63% | 21.45% | +58.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.63% | 29.09% | +50.54% |
Dividends
GIPR vs. PFLT - Dividend Comparison
GIPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPR Generation Income Properties, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.86% | 11.85% | 12.46% | 2.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. | 17.12% | 13.27% | 11.25% | 9.98% | 10.38% | 8.93% | 10.83% | 9.24% | 9.59% | 8.31% | 8.08% | 10.04% |
Financials
GIPR vs. PFLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Generation Income Properties, Inc. and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GIPR and PFLT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIPR has higher volatility (42.88%) compared to PFLT (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIPR dropped -99.02% vs PFLT's -69.77%.
GIPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIPR and PFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer