GIPIX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
GIPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | -2.44% | 10.80% | 8.51% | 12.49% | -14.43% | 7.94% | 11.09% | 15.68% | -6.52% | 11.63% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -2.76% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 29.61% | 15.15% | -1.17% | 3.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIPIX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's -2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GIPIX has underperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 5.45%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.95% annualized return.
GIPIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 8.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.45%
COTZX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIPIX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GIPIX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
GIPIX
COTZX
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIPIX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.20 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.06 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 10.72 | -6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIPIX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.95 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIPIX and COTZX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
GIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than COTZX's 3.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIPIX Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio | 5.95% | 5.22% | 4.06% | 2.12% | 4.56% | 6.37% | 2.25% | 2.51% | 4.70% | 4.51% | 1.46% | 5.73% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.46% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIPIX drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIPIX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIPIX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -47.48% | +18.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -5.40% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.65% | -17.80% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.65% | -17.80% | -2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | -3.79% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.49% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.04% | +0.61% |
Volatility
GIPIX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 2.15%. This indicates that GIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIPIX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.15% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.78% | 3.41% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 8.52% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.93% | 7.28% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 7.35% | +0.71% |