GINX vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GINX (SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GINX is actively managed, while IMFL is passively managed. Over the past year, GINX returned 28.48% vs 33.05% for IMFL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GINX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

GINX vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 17.58% return.

GINX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 28.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: 20.95%
• 1Y: 33.05%
• 3Y*: 17.51%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINX vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	11.48%	25.06%	5.69%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	17.58%	30.89%	-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GINX and IMFL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.71

The correlation between GINX and IMFL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINX vs. IMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GINX	IMFL
Financial Services	29.3%	11.0%
Technology	10.7%	15.4%
Energy	10.4%	5.9%
Healthcare	9.9%	12.8%
Industrials	9.4%	17.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	11.6%
Utilities	7.0%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	7.5%
Communication Services	4.8%	3.6%
Basic Materials	4.1%	5.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.5%

Return for Risk

GINX vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINX

GINX Risk / Return Rank: 71
GINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GINX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GINX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 60
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINX vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GINX	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.12	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.88	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.82	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	9.97	+2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GINX vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINX and IMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GINX	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.12	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.62	+0.74

Drawdowns

GINX vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINX drawdown since its inception was -12.53%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINX and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GINX	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.53%	-33.26%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-11.77%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.54%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-7.24%	+5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	3.32%	-0.99%

Volatility

GINX vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX) is 3.39%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that GINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GINX	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	5.74%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	13.08%	-3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	15.71%	-3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.84%	16.05%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	15.99%	-2.15%

GINX vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

GINX vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

GINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than IMFL's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GINX SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF	2.19%	2.81%	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.87%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GINX and IMFL in my portfolio?

GINX and IMFL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GINX or IMFL?

IMFL has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to GINX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINX dropped -12.53% vs IMFL's -33.26%.

Which ETF is better, GINX or IMFL?

On 1-year performance, IMFL leads with 33.05% vs 28.48% for GINX. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GINX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GINX or IMFL?

Over the 1-year period, IMFL has performed better with a 33.05% return vs 28.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GINX or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for GINX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GINX or IMFL?

IMFL has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.19% for GINX.

What is the main difference between GINX and IMFL?

They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for GINX and 0.34% for IMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.